Many think that alternative and conventional medicine has the same definition of cancer cure. Well, they have different meaning and definition when they use the word “cure” for cancer.
How Mainstream Cancer Organizations Define Cancer Cure
This means that even if the patient suffers terribly due to the adverse side effects from the conventional therapies used, suffer all kinds of ailments due to a weakened immune system, and live for only 5 years and 2 weeks after diagnosis, they would add that to their official statistics as “cured” simply because the patient lived for 5 years after diagnosis.
Due to this strange definition of a cure, official cancer cure rates put out by mainstream cancer organizations make it look as if conventional medical approaches are more successful than they really are.
Many cancer patients who were terminally ill or who started treatment in their late stages don’t cross the 5 years plan. Those who manage to cross it amidst low quality of life and other adverse side effects are those who started treatment when it was detected early.
Others (about 3%) that survived the harsh treatments and lived more than 5 years never even had cancers in the first place as a result of iatrogenic factors.
This is the main reason the medical establishment is screaming and pushing for early detections so that they can have higher rates of people crossing the 5 years span which will boosts their statistics of treatment cures in turn.
Redefining the definition of cure just to make your therapies look as if they work is not only criminal but inhumane.
This is just one of the many questionable tactics used to forge and manipulate conventional cancer statistics to mislead the public and make them look better.
How Alternative Medicine Define Cancer Cure
In natural medicine, we tend to avoid the word “cure” when handling cancer and other degenerative diseases. We even avoid the word “treat cancer” because we would get into trouble with conventional medicine if we claim to do either.
So what we use are “control cancer”, “long-term recovery rates”, etc. Despite all these, records and statistics show that alternative cancer treatments are effective at bringing about real “cures” and a longer lifespan for cancer patients than conventional medicine.
This is why people who used alternative cancer treatment and sent their cancers into remission can be said to be cured. Because when they test, they are actually cancer-free and are no more suffering from the disease.
Despite the fact that we are to leave cancer treatments to oncologists and not even use the word “treat” or “cure”, we are still happily pointing people in the right direction.
We work closely with them and help them restore their bodies into balance so the body can heal itself because only the body can heal itself and nothing else.
We don’t even want to treat cancer, cure it or fight it, we just want to clean the environment that supported its growth in the first place. There is great success in this than trying to treat or cure cancer.
A Chinese proverb I love so much says: “A person who says it can’t be done should not stop others from doing it”.
Also remember, if someone says they don’t know why something happens, they cannot cure it. Knowing the cause is knowing half of the cure.