What does “integrative cancer treatment” mean?
The term “integrative cancer treatment” is used to show the attempt to combine alternative and non-mainstream treatment to someone’s current medical care, especially in the case of cancer for the best interest of the patient.
These treatments (alternative therapies) are not taught to doctors in medical schools, they don’t understand them, they are not in the medical journals, and are not recommended by doctors to their patients.
These alternative therapies are not covered by health insurance. Despite all these drawbacks around alternative therapies, it doesn’t mean they are not effective.
In fact, they have documented records of higher efficacy than conventional treatments (chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, and drugs).
Can alternative treatment cure my cancer?
In naturopathic medicine, it is the body that cures and nothing else. So what our therapies do is to improve every aspect of you, your spirit, soul, and body so that your body, in turn, can cure its disease.
We don’t treat cancer, we don’t fight it, we only remove the root causes, detox, supply the right nutrients, help you remove trapped and suppressed negative emotions, and hold your hands with love as your body fights off this disease.
So we simply, work on the body, remove the root causes, achieve homeostasis (bring the body back into balance), and the body will cure itself.
Be careful about people who claim to cure cancer and don’t settle for a “one size fits all approach”.
There are many reasons why people get cancer and everyone is different. So we don’t promise to cure, treat, or fight your cancer, what we do is to treat the whole you , not the disease, and this will allow your body to heal itself.
How does alternative cancer treatment work?
Alternative cancer treatments deal with the root causes of diseases and with your whole body in a non-toxic and non-invasive way. In naturopathic medicine, we don’t treat the disease but the patient.
This is a much more effective way to completely get rid of a person’s cancer than using toxic and invasive procedures. These toxic approaches target only the tumor and symptoms themselves and this in turn, leads to adverse side effects, low quality of life, and even early death.
What causes cancer?
I get asked this question regularly and the truth is that cancer doesn’t have one cause, it has many causes. This is why a one-size fit all approach is not the best way to handle cancer.
Some (not all because there are over 30 interacting causes) of the common causes of cancer are:
- Chlorinated water
- Fluoridated water and fluoride toothpaste
- Smoking and using tobacco products
- Hormone therapies
- Immune suppressive drugs
- Depressed thyroid function
- Mercury toxicity
- Synthetic food additives
- Irradiated foods
- Wrong diet and nutritional deficiencies
- Chronic stress
- Free radicals
- Toxic and negative thoughts and emotions
- Genetic disposition and many more
The right treatment plan should include how to remove all these and prevent them in future so that the body can heal and remain healed.
The medical establishments are actively looking for a cancer cure, so we won’t need alternative cancer care in the future.
If this is your view, please don’t hold your breath yet. I cannot predict the future but this looks impossible until things change by people taking responsibilities of their health and demanding for medical freedoms.
The medical establishment’s war on cancer started since the 1940’s and till date we are yet to see a cure. While they keep promising a cure year after year, they squash real cures because they are not profitable or patentable.
This might not be on purpose and it can also be on purpose. I believe they are looking for cures in the wrong places. They want things that can be patented and make huge profits.
And healing doesn’t come from such approaches. This is why their therapies are highly toxic and cause damages to the human body. Due to the toxic nature of these drugs, they can’t use enough of them to kill every cancer cell in the patient’s body because that would result to the death of the patient.
If an oncologist does this, the cancer would go and so would the patient.
Another reason why it seems impossible for conventional medicine to come up with cancer cures is because they are tightly regulated by big pharmaceutical companies.
The pharmaceutical companies are the ones that fund most of these cancer researches, including those performed at the universities. They only fund research that leads to patented drugs that can bring them huge profits.
Those interested in making research on alternative medicine won’t get funding until they include chemotherapy or some other forms of conventional treatments.
Their main goal is to make money, and not to test what works, and not even to cure cancer. I read a true life story of a young researcher who was happy to be in a research team.
His enthusiasm was so high that his colleagues told him to relax, that they are not here to search for a cure but to get their next grant.
Regulatory bodies that are supposed to be fair and protect the public have now become a strong arm and watchdog of big pharma.
So while mainstream medicine claim to be searching for cancer cures, they are actively ignoring and burying real cures that have existed for long and even new ones that are coming out because they can’t bring in much money.
Is there any conspiracy to suppress alternative cancer treatment?
Many use the word “conspiracy” but I don’t think that is the right word to use here because money and power are behind the real suppression that has been going on for decades.
The suppression is not so organized to use the word “conspiracy”. To know more about the oppression by the pharmaceutical companies and their wide range of influence, read these books: World without cancer by G. Edward Griffin and the cancer industry by Dr. Ralph Moses.
The cancer industry is just trying to protect their profits and they are doing this using unscrupulous methods like influencing laws. This is why these mainstream cancer establishments are in “collusion” to suppress alternative treatments that threaten their profits.
Can I still consult an oncologist if using alternative cancer treatment?
Yes, you should do so. We advise people to do so. There are some cases, you might need surgery. Apart from this, you also need regular checkups to know the state of things in your body, if the therapy is working and things are getting better.
These are why we advise people to still keep in touch with their conventional oncologist or doctor.
Also, in some cases, where the cancer is already advanced, the patient might need a short-term chemotherapy or radiation to slow the growth of the tumor and for the alternative therapy to work.
You can also use the opportunity to ask the oncologist the adverse side effects of the treatment he is recommending and other important questions that come to your mind.
Relating with an oncologist and naturopath will help you weigh your options and make an informed decision. In some cases, the combination of conventional and alternative medicine (integrative) works best for some patients.
Can I use conventional and alternative approaches at the same time?
This is usually the best because those left to conventional therapies alone will need a miracle to survive. Do your research and be as informed as possible.
We hope this have answered your questions on alternative cancer treatments. However, if you have other questions, kindly drop them in the comment section and we will reply to you as soon as possible.
What are your cancer treatment protocols?
We don’t have a “one-size” fit all approach to cancer because everyone is different, and no two cancers are exactly alike. So we build a treatment protocol for you alone.
This is why our consultation is very deep. We ask lots of questions, ask about medical history and records, and other things that can help us know you better and the right therapies to integrate for you.
If you have more questions, you can contact us here.